1-888-760-7339

Liability Issues In Maryland Injury Cases

HOME
 
LIABILITY
DAMAGES
INSURANCE
 
PLEADINGS
DISCOVERY
 
BIRTH INJURIES
WRONGFUL DEATH
MOTORCYCLE
TRUCK
 
REFERRAL
LINK EXCHANGE
 
CONTACT

 

 

 

Maryland Injury Attorney    Car Accident In Maryland    Accident in MD  Maryland Birth Injury Attorney  Maryland Personal Injury Attorney  Maryland Auto Accident Attorney   Maryland Car Accident  Accident Maryland   Maryland Medical Malpractice Lawyer

 

 

The Law Offices Of:

 

KEITH BLAIR BARTNIK, P.A.

 

Call My Office. I Will Discuss Your Case

Over the Phone and Provide a Case Evaluation

 At No Cost to You

1-888-760-7339

 

Post Trial Motions

RULE 2-532. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT

             (a) When Permitted.  In a jury trial, a party may move for judgment notwithstanding the verdict only if that party made a motion for judgment at the close of all the evidence and only on the grounds advanced in support of the earlier motion.

             (b) Time for Filing.  The motion shall be filed within ten days after entry of judgment on the verdict or, if no verdict is returned, within ten days after the discharge of the jury.  If the court reserves ruling on a motion for judgment made at the close of all the evidence, that motion becomes a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict if the verdict is against the moving party or if no verdict is returned.

             (c) Joinder With Motion for New Trial.  A motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict may be joined with a motion for a new trial.

             (d) Effect of Failure to Make Motion.  Failure to move for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict under this Rule does not affect a party's right upon appeal to assign as error the denial of that party's motion for judgment.

             (e) Disposition.  If a verdict has been returned, the court may deny the motion, or it may grant the motion, set aside any judgment entered on the verdict, and direct the entry of a new judgment.  If a verdict has not been returned, the court may grant the motion and direct the entry of judgment or order a new trial.  If a party's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is granted, the court at the same time shall decide whether to grant that party's motion for new trial, if any, should the judgment thereafter be reversed on appeal.

             (f) Effect of Reversal on Appeal.

             (1) When Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict Granted.  If a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is granted and the appellate court reverses, it may (A) enter judgment on the original verdict, (B) remand the case for a new trial in accordance with a conditional order of the trial court, or (C) itself order a new trial.  If the trial court has conditionally denied a motion for new trial, the appellee may assert error in that denial and, if the judgment notwithstanding the verdict is reversed, subsequent proceedings shall be in accordance with the order of the appellate court.

             (2) When Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict Denied.  If a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict has been denied and the appellate court reverses, it may (A) enter judgment as if the motion had been granted or (B) itself order a new trial.  If the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict has been denied, the prevailing party may, as appellee, assert grounds entitling that party to a new trial in the event the appellate court concludes that the trial court erred in denying the motion.  If the appellate court reverses the judgment, nothing in this Rule precludes it from determining that the appellee is entitled to a new trial or from directing the trial court to determine whether a new trial should be granted.

 RULE 2-533. MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL

             (a) Time for Filing.  Any party may file a motion for new trial within ten days after entry of judgment.  A party whose verdict has been set aside on a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a party whose judgment has been amended on a motion to amend the judgment may file a motion for new trial within ten days after entry of the judgment notwithstanding the verdict or the amended judgment.

             (b) Grounds.  All grounds advanced in support of the motion shall be filed in writing within the time prescribed for the filing of the motion, and no other grounds shall thereafter be assigned without leave of court.

             (c) Disposition.  The court may set aside all or part of any judgment entered and grant a new trial to all or any of the parties and on all of the issues, or some of the issues if the issues are fairly severable.  If a partial new trial is granted, the judge may direct the entry of judgment as to the remaining parties or issues or stay the entry of judgment until after the new trial.  When a motion for new trial is joined with a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is granted, the court at the same time shall decide whether to grant that party's motion for new trial if the judgment is thereafter reversed on appeal.

             (d) Costs.  If a trial or appellate court has ordered the payment of costs as a part of its action in granting a new trial, the trial court may order all further proceedings stayed until the costs have been paid.

 RULE 2-534. MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND A JUDGMENT--COURT DECISION

             In an action decided by the court, on motion of any party filed within ten days after entry of judgment, the court may open the judgment to receive additional evidence, may amend its findings or its statement of reasons for the decision, may set forth additional findings or reasons, may enter new findings or new reasons, may amend the judgment, or may enter a new judgment.  A motion to alter or amend a judgment may be joined with a motion for new trial.

 RULE 2-535. REVISORY POWER

             (a) Generally.  On motion of any party filed within 30 days after entry of judgment, the court may exercise revisory power and control over the judgment and, if the action was tried before the court, may take any action that it could have taken under Rule 2-534.

             (b) Fraud, Mistake, Irregularity.  On motion of any party filed at any time, the court may exercise revisory power and control over the judgment in case of fraud, mistake, or irregularity.

             (c) Newly-Discovered Evidence.  On motion of any party filed within 30 days after entry of judgment, the court may grant a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence that could not have been discovered by due diligence in time to move for a new trial pursuant to Rule 2-533.

             (d) Clerical Mistakes.  Clerical mistakes in judgments, orders, or other parts of the record may be corrected by the court at any time on its own initiative, or on motion of any party after such notice, if any, as the court orders.  During the pendency of an appeal, such mistakes may be so corrected before the appeal is docketed by the appellate court, and thereafter with leave of the appellate court.

 RULE 2-551. IN BANC REVIEW

             (a) Generally.  When review by a court in banc is permitted by the Maryland Constitution, a party may have a judgment or determination of any point or question reviewed by a court in banc by filing a notice for in banc review.  Issues are reserved for in banc review by making an objection in the manner set forth in Rules 2-517 and 2-520.  Upon the filing of the notice, the Circuit Administrative Judge shall designate three judges of the circuit, other than the judge who tried the action, to sit in banc.

             (b) Time for Filing.  Except as otherwise provided in this section, the notice for in banc review shall be filed within ten days after entry of judgment.  When a timely motion is filed pursuant to Rule 2-532, 2-533, or 2-534, the notice for in banc review shall be filed within ten days after entry of an order denying a motion pursuant to Rule 2-533 or disposing of a motion pursuant to Rule 2-532 or 2-534.  A notice for in banc review filed before the disposition of any of these motions that was timely filed shall have no effect, and a new notice for in banc review must be filed within the time specified in this section.

             (c) Memoranda.  Within 30 days after the filing of the notice for in banc review, the party seeking review shall file four copies of a memorandum stating concisely the questions presented, any facts necessary to decide them, and supporting argument.  Within 15 days thereafter, an opposing party who wishes to dispute the statement of questions or facts shall file four copies of a memorandum stating the alternative questions presented, any additional or different facts, and supporting argument.  In the absence of such dispute, an opposing party may file a memorandum of argument.

             (d) Transcript.  Promptly after the filing of memoranda, a judge of the panel shall determine, by reviewing the memoranda and, if necessary, by conferring with counsel, whether a transcript of all or part of the proceeding is reasonably required for decision of the questions presented.  If a transcript is required, the judge shall order one of the parties to provide the transcript and shall fix a time for its filing.  The expenses of the transcript shall be assessed as costs against the losing party, unless otherwise ordered by the panel.

            (e) Hearing and Decision.  A hearing shall be scheduled as soon as practicable but need not be held if all parties notify the clerk in writing at least 15 days before the scheduled hearing date that the hearing has been waived.  In rendering its decision, the panel shall file a brief statement of the reasons for the decision or shall dictate the reasons into the record.

             (f) Motion to Shorten or Extend Time Requirements.  Upon motion of any party filed pursuant to Rule 1-204, any judge of the panel may shorten or extend the time requirements of this Rule, except the time for filing a notice for in banc review.

             (g) Dismissal.  The panel, on its own initiative or on motion of any party, shall dismiss an in banc review if (1) in banc review is not permitted by the Maryland Constitution, (2) the notice for in banc review was prematurely filed or not timely filed, or (3) the case has become moot, and the panel may dismiss if the memorandum of the party seeking review was not timely filed.

             (h) Further Review.  Any party who seeks and obtains review under this Rule has no further right of appeal.  The decision of the panel does not preclude an appeal to the Court of Special Appeals by an opposing party who is otherwise entitled to appeal.

 RULE 8-202. NOTICE OF APPEAL--TIMES FOR FILING

             (a) Generally.  Except as otherwise provided in this Rule or by law, the notice of appeal shall be filed within 30 days after entry of the judgment or order from which the appeal is taken.  In this Rule, "judgment" includes a verdict or decision of a circuit court to which issues have been sent from an Orphans' Court.

             (b) Criminal Action--Motion for New Trial.  In a criminal action, when a timely motion for a new trial is filed pursuant to Rule 4-331(a), the notice of appeal shall be filed within 30 days after the later of (1) entry of the judgment or (2) entry of a notice withdrawing the motion or an order denying the motion.

             (c) Civil Action--Post Judgment Motions.  In a civil action, when a timely motion is filed pursuant to Rule 2-532, 2-533, or 2-534, the notice of appeal shall be filed within 30 days after entry of (1) a notice withdrawing the motion or (2) an order denying a motion pursuant to Rule 2-533 or disposing of a motion pursuant to Rule 2-532 or 2-534.  A notice of appeal filed before the withdrawal or disposition of any of these motions does not deprive the trial court of jurisdiction to dispose of the motion.

             (d) When Notice for In Banc Review Filed.  A party who files a timely notice for in banc review pursuant to Rule 2-551 or 4-352 may file a notice of appeal provided that (1) the notice of appeal is filed within 30 days after entry of the judgment or order from which the appeal is taken and (2) the notice for in banc review has been withdrawn before the notice of appeal is filed and prior to any hearing before or decision by the in banc court.  A notice of appeal by any other party shall be filed within 30 days after entry of a notice withdrawing the request for in banc review or an order disposing of it.  Any earlier notice of appeal by that other party does not deprive the in banc court of jurisdiction to conduct the in banc review.

            (e) Appeals by Other Party--Within Ten Days.  If one party files a timely notice of appeal, any other party may file a notice of appeal within ten days after the date on which the first notice of appeal was filed or within any longer time otherwise allowed by this Rule.

             (f) Date of Entry.  "Entry" as used in this Rule occurs on the day when the clerk of the lower court first makes a record in writing of the judgment, notice, or order on the file jacket, on a docket within the file, or in a docket book, according to the practice of that court, and records the actual date of the entry.

 

No Nonsense Legal Representation

Car Accident In Maryland

Wrongful Death

Malpractice

Truck Accident

Motorcycle Accident

WHEN EXPERIENCE COUNTS ....

 COUNT ON AN ATTORNEY WITH EXPERIENCE

 

 

 

 

1-888-760-7339

 

 

 
Offices Located Through Out Maryland

Anne Arundel County: 7310 Ritchie Highway, Ste 910 Glen Burnie, Maryland 21061 (410) 760-7339

Baltimore City Office Meeting Location: 111 South Calvert Street, Ste 2700, Baltimore, Maryland 21202 (410) 685-7339

Baltimore County: 10451 Mill Run Circle, Ste 400, Owings Mills, Maryland 21136 (410) 363-7339

Howard County Office Meeting Location: 10480 Little Patuxent Parkway, Ste 400, Columbia, Maryland 21044 (410) 740-7339

Prince George County: 6301 Ivy Lane Suite 700, Greenbelt, Maryland 20770 (301) 474-7339

1-888-760-7339

 
Search for Mr. Bartnik on Yahoo, Google and MSN under the following search terms: Maryland Lawyer, Car Accident, Traffic Accident, divorce, divorce in Maryland, divorce lawyers in Maryland, Maryland Divorce, child custody in Maryland, child support, alimony, MD attorney, Maryland divorce lawyer, attorney, Maryland attorney, marital property, parents visitation rights, Maryland law, child support attorney, military divorce lawyer, Prince George County lawyer, Baltimore City Lawyer, good lawyer in Maryland, Howard County Lawyer, trial attorney, Maryland trial lawyer. Maryland Personal Injury, auto accident, motorcycle accident, wrongful death, medical malpractice, legal malpractice, personal injury statute of limitations, serious personal injury, Prince George County lawyer.

DISLAIMER: Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.. has created this website to be informative, but you should remember the contents are general in nature and not meant to substitute the specific legal advice given by an attorney based on your individual questions and needs. We have made every effort to provide up to date information and links, however we make no guarantees. Viewing this website and communicating with us by electronic mail or making a general inquiry does not create an attorney client relationship. You should be aware that contacting our law firm through the internet is not considered secure and therefore you should not send confidential or sensitive information that may be illegally intercepted by others.

COPY RIGHT: All content herein is the sole ownership of Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.

Home ] Up ] Referrals ] Insurance ] Evidence ] Malpractice ] Discovery ] Liability ] Damages ] Sitemap ]

Hit Counter

This site was last updated 01/15/08