Maryland Injury Attorney, Maryland Personal Injury Attorneys, Maryland Personal Injury Lawyers, Maryland Personal Injury Attorney, Maryland Personal Injury Lawyer, Accident Baltimore

1-888-760-7339

Liability As Seen by Maryland Personal Injury Attorneys

HOME
 
LIABILITY
DAMAGES
INSURANCE
 
PLEADINGS
DISCOVERY
 
BIRTH INJURIES
WRONGFUL DEATH
MOTORCYCLE
TRUCK
 
REFERRAL
LINK EXCHANGE
 
CONTACT

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Law Offices Of:

 

KEITH BLAIR BARTNIK, P.A.

 

 

LIABILITY ISSUES As Seen by Maryland Personal Injury Lawyers

All Maryland personal injury lawyers will tell you "Every person in the state of Maryland owes a duty to each and every other person to act as a reasonable and prudent person under the given circumstances". This is called the standard of care. When this duty is breached it is said the offending person was negligent. The terms "duty of ordinary care" and "duty of reasonable care"  and "standard of care" are interchangeable; they all mean due care—that is, care according to the circumstances of the case.  The duty to exercise reasonable care is a standard of care designed to protect society's members from unreasonable exposure to potentially injurious hazards, and negligence is conduct that falls short of the reasonable-care standard.

In Maryland Car Accident Cases

Maryland personal injury lawyers say the general rule is "every automobile driver must exercise toward every other driver that duty of care which a person of ordinary prudence would exercise under similar circumstances". Baltimore Transit Co., v Prinz 215 Md 398 (1958)

·         Negligent Entrustment: When the owner knows of should know that the person he is lending his vehicle to is likely to use the vehicle in a manner involving risk of harm to others, the owner may be held liable Macky v Dorsey 104 Md. App. 250 (1995). Other wise the mere ownership of a vehicle does not impute liability Toscano v Spriggs 343 Md 320 (1996).

In Maryland Premises Liability Cases (Slip and Fall Cases)

  • The standard of care owed by a possessor of land depends upon the status of the person on the land. There are three categories of status. For example there is an invitee, licensee, or trespasser.

  • As to an Invitee ie: when you are in a store for example: a possessor of land is liable for harm caused to invitees by a condition of which the possessor is aware, or which, in the exercise of due care, he or she should have been aware, and which the possessor should realize involves an unreasonable risk to the invitees and he or she has no reason to believe that they will discover or realize the risk involved. As such the possessor must exercises reasonable care, either to make the condition reasonably safe or to give a warning adequate to enable the invitee to avoid the harm; however, he or she owes no duty to an invitee or business visitor to warn of a dangerous condition which is obvious to a person exercising ordinary care.

  • As to Licensee ie: when you are visiting a friends home for example: There are two types of "licensee". One is the bare licensee and the other a licensee by invitation, or social guest. A licensee is one privileged to enter another's land by virtue of the possessor's consent, for the licensee's own purposes. A licensee must take the property as he or she finds it. The owner or person in charge of the property owes no duty to a licensee to keep the property in a safe condition or to anticipate the licensee's presence and to warn him or her. The only duty an owner or person in charge of property owes to a licensee is that if he or she becomes aware of the licensee's presence, he or she must not injure the licensee willfully or wantonly or entrap the licensee. The duty of a possessor to use care and to avoid injuries to a licensee upon the possessor's land does not arise until he or she has actual knowledge that the licensee is in peril, and if the possessor fails under such circumstances to exercise the care of a reasonably prudent person, he or she is said to act with reckless disregard for the safety of others, and this action is considered willful or wanton misconduct.

 

In Maryland Malpractice Cases

 

In medical malpractice cases a medical provider must act as a reasonable and prudent doctor. As such a medical provider is negligent when he/she does something or fails to do some thing  that a reasonably prudent doctor or other health care professional in that field would or would not do under the same or similar circumstances. There is a procedure to be followed in medical malpractice cases before you are eligible to file suit in Maryland. This procedure requires that the negligence of the medical provider must first be certified as a deviation from the standard of care. As such each medical malpractice case requires advances review by an expert.

 

Vicarious Liability

Vicarious liability relationships that can give rise to liability are employment, agency, partnership, or joint venture. The rules of vicarious liability respond to a need in the law to fully compensate an injury. Once the evidence establishes agency, vicarious liability increases the likelihood that injury will be compensated. For example, if the responsible agent is unavailable or lacks ability to pay, an innocent victim now has recourse against principal. Thus, pursuant to principles of vicarious liability an employer can be liable for the torts committed by its employees.

  • Respondeat Superior: An employer may be held liable for the torts committed by their employee while acting in the scope of their employment. Oaks v Connors 339 Md 24 (1995)

Strict Liability

 

Third Party Liability

 

Joint and Several Liability

 

Governmental Liability

Employer's Immunity

In Maryland an employer is given certain protections against suits by an employee. For example an employee and his dependants can not maintain an action in tort against the employer since the workers compensation remedy is exclusive Maryland Annotated Code 9-509. A injured employee may maintain suit against a co-employee for the co-employee's negligence. Such as when both are riding is a vehicle and the co-employee negligently causes an accident during the course of employment. 

Maryland, however, is one of some dozen States which permit employees to pursue their common-law remedies against co-employees. The rationale here is that “in the exchange for sure and swift compensation the worker has given up the right to sue his employer but not his fellow employee, because the fellow employee is not a party to such an agreement and has given up nothing in return for such an immunity.” Connor v. Hauch, 50 Md.App. 217, 223, 437 A.2d 661, 664 (1981). § 9-903(a)  has been interpreted as permitting co-employee suits. Athas v. Hill, 300 Md. 133, 137, 476 A.2d 710, 712 (1984); Leonard v. Sav-A-Stop Servs, 289 Md. 204, 208, 424 A.2d 336, 337 (1981); Gray v. State Rds. Comm'n, 253 Md. 421, 424-425, 252 A.2d 810, 812 (1969).

 

No Nonsense Legal Representation

Maryland personal injury lawyers

Wrongful Death

Malpractice

Truck Accident

Motorcycle Accident

WHEN EXPERIENCE COUNTS ....

 COUNT ON AN ATTORNEY WITH EXPERIENCE

 

 

 

 

1-888-760-7339

 

 

 
Offices Located Through Out Maryland

Anne Arundel County: 7310 Ritchie Highway, Ste 910 Glen Burnie, Maryland 21061 (410) 760-7339

Baltimore City Office Meeting Location: 111 South Calvert Street, Ste 2700, Baltimore, Maryland 21202 (410) 685-7339

Baltimore County: 10451 Mill Run Circle, Ste 400, Owings Mills, Maryland 21136 (410) 363-7339

Howard County Office Meeting Location: 10480 Little Patuxent Parkway, Ste 400, Columbia, Maryland 21044 (410) 740-7339

Prince George County: 6301 Ivy Lane Suite 700, Greenbelt, Maryland 20770 (301) 474-7339

1-888-760-7339

 
Search for Mr. Bartnik on Yahoo, Google and MSN under the following search terms: rland Injury Attorney, Maryland Personal Injury Attorneys, Maryland Personal Injury Lawyers, Maryland Personal Injury Attorney, Maryland Personal Injury Lawyer, Accident Baltimore Maryland Lawyer, Car Accident, Traffic Accident,  attorney, Maryland attorney, Maryland law, child support attorney, military divorce lawyer, Prince George County lawyer, Baltimore City Lawyer, good lawyer in Maryland, Howard County Lawyer, trial attorney, Maryland trial lawyer. Maryland Personal Injury, auto accident, motorcycle accident, wrongful death, medical malpractice, legal malpractice, personal injury statute of limitations, serious personal injury, Prince George County lawyer. Annapolis Baltimore Bel Air Beltsville Bethesda Bowie Burtonsville Cambridge Catonsville Chestertown Chevy Chase Cockeysville College Park Columbia Crofton Crownsville Cumberland Denton Derwood Dundalk Easton Elkton Ellicott City Essex Fort Washington Frederick Gaithersburg Germantown Glen Burnie Greenbelt Hagerstown Halethorpe Hunt Valley Hyattsville Kensington La Plata Lanham Largo Laurel Leonardtown Lexington Park Linthicum Heights Lutherville Timonium Nottingham Oakland Ocean City  Owings Mills Oxon Hill Parkville Pasadena Pikesville Potomac Prince Frederick Reisterstown Riverdale Rockville Salisbury Severna Park Silver Spring Suitland Sykesville Takoma Park Towson Upper Marlboro Waldorf
Westminster

DISLAIMER: Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.. has created this website to be informative, but you should remember the contents are general in nature and not meant to substitute the specific legal advice given by an attorney based on your individual questions and needs. We have made every effort to provide up to date information and links, however we make no guarantees. Viewing this website and communicating with us by electronic mail or making a general inquiry does not create an attorney client relationship. You should be aware that contacting our law firm through the internet is not considered secure and therefore you should not send confidential or sensitive information that may be illegally intercepted by others.

COPY RIGHT: All content herein is the sole ownership of Keith Blair Bartnik, P.A.

Hit Counter

This site was last updated 01/15/08